Friday, September 17, 2004

hmm

Great discussion on Ask MetaFilter concerning the history of scientific discovery:
How is it that people knew enough to build huge ships that could sail thousands of miles, navigating by the stars, and enough to engineer huge, ornate buildings that would outlive them by hundreds of years, but it took until the late 19th century to figure out that splashing a little alcohol in a wound, and on surgical instruments, could reduce infection? How could no one have discovered this? They had alcohol -- wouldn't you think just through blind luck or trial and error, over millions of incidents of wound treatment, they would have uncovered this? Why was "cleaning a wound" such a foreign concept to them? They cleaned clothes, floors, their own bodies, etc. but nobody noticed that a clean surgical environment had a salutory effect?


Not sure if I like this quote from the thread, though: "One of the first things said to me in my med school lectures was, "50% of what you're going to learn over the next four years is wrong. Unfortunately, we don't know which 50%."